Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 02:46
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Why would Hugh Grant cheat on Elizabeth Hurley?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Geomagnetic storm could make northern lights visible in Chicago on Sunday night - Chicago Sun-Times
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
A high-resolution spectrometer that fits into smartphones - Phys.org
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
A new type of X-point radiator that prevents tokamaks from overheating - Phys.org
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Donald Trump says he will only pick Fed chair who cuts interest rates - Financial Times
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Why am I sweating so much at night even though my room is really cold?